|
|
 |
Sunday 2nd XI - Reports
|
2000
 30th July 2000
| |
Amersham II v Grays Inn
Grays Inn 196 (N Moore 4-42, B Watt 3-44)
Amersham 179 (J Alwyn 59, P Walsh 50)
Grays Inn won by 17 runs
On paper, we had a relatively strong 2nd XI for a Sunday which made the
resulting loss that much harder to stomach. Although we only had 2
recognised bowlers, this was not the real cause of the opposition's 196.
Key dropped catches were more to blame with their main batsman being
dropped on 3 before going on to make 85. The rest of their innings was one
of total frustration as they managed to miss Amersham fielders by inches on
numerous occasions. Thanks though to Messrs Watt and Moore for making the
bowling at least respectable from one end.
Just as Grays Inn missed our fielders, so Phil Walsh found them. His second
successive fifty for the team was the backbone of the innings but this
included a 45 ball period in which he scored just 2. At the start of the 20
overs, an Amersham win looked unlikely. A middle order collapse brought the
captain to the wicket and this helped to dynamise Phil Walsh. The run rate
required was nearly 7 an over but this reduced to 23 runs needed from the
last 4 overs. Amersham's chance of victory disappeared when Alwyn was out
for 59 from 40 balls. A case of so near, yet so far plus a reminder that
catches win matches. | |
Jeremy Alwyn |
 23rd July 2000
| |
Bledlow Ridge v Amersham II
Bledlow Ridge 192 (David Viney 6-55)
Amersham 194-2 (John Langley 81, Philip Walsh 57)
Amersham won by 8 wickets
In a side that had 6 recognised opening batsmen and 2 wicketkeepers, the
captain decided to insert the opposition. Our one recogised bowler, David
Viney, bowled very well for 6-55 and in many ways deserved better figures.
Niall Densley also bowled his medium pacers with no luck but picked up
their captain with a good yorker. Mark Van Doyvenbode offered a variety of
off-spin and even an over of devastating pace. On the whole, a poor batting
side made 192 - probably 100 more than they should have been dismissed for.
However, it was rather hoped that this score would allow all the rest of
the team a game. However, an opening stand of 125 betweeen John Langley and
Philip Walsh ensured that 3 people did not either bat or bowl. John Langley
rediscovered his form after an early "life" and drove the ball powerfully.
Phil Walsh's timing was excellent and he worked the ball off his pads with
ease in an expert innings.. Rob Viney helped us reach our target with 5
overs to spare.
So our first win of the season. 22 players have now turned out in the first
4 games of the season, of whom 11 have only played one match. With 4 games
still to go, it would be nice to round off the season with a consistent
side and a couple more wins. | |
Jeremy Alwyn |
 2nd July 2000
| |
Longwick v Amersham II
Amersham 103
Longwick 104 - 6 (C Holloway 4-36)
Longwick won by 4 wickets
Despite the fact that the pitch did not look easy from
the outset, the captain decided to bat after winning
the toss. This was based on the depth of batting held
rather than any tactical foresight. In the end our
score was never going to be enough. Not a single
batsman reached 20 and there was not much for the
neutral spectator as we struggled at a rate of under 3
runs per over. In reality, the pitch was uneven in
pace and bounce and was trickier to bat on that the
Financial Times Mephisto Crossword.
With a small choice of regular bowlers, Viney snr and
Holloway opened. Matcham jnr also bowled his spin
extremely well and was most unlucky not to pick up a
couple of wickets. The luck never really came our way
other than short-leg picking up 3 dolly catches.
Holloway ended up with the best figures of the day
with 4-36, but we did not have enough runs to defend
and lost with nearly an hour still to go. | |
Jeremy Alwyn |
 4th June 2000
| |
Amersham II v Chenies & Latimer II
Amersham 208-5 dec (42 ovs; D Bulman 48*, M Van Duyvenbode 34)
Chenies & Latimer 112-9 (40 ovs; J Finch 6-27, D Viney 2-24)
Match drawn
The second match of the season, saw the Sunday 2nd X1 field its usual eclectic mix. Andrew Viney made a fine debut at the age of 11 and fielded like a demon at fine leg. Messrs Finch and Bullman found that they were surplus to requirements for the cup match and kindly demonstrated the gulf that exists between Sunday casuals and two high-class performers. It was a shame, therefore, that a win could not be manufactured and the opposition batted out the last 6 overs of Antipodean pace to finish the match 9 wickets down. The batting never really looked under pressure even before Bullman's entry with good efforts from Mark Van Duyvenbode (before being fingered by a jubilant Harry Heslop), Hugo Matcham, Huw Thomas and Rob Viney. The opposition bowling progressed at test match pace ensuring a late tea.
John Finch proved that Corporal Jones was right about Chenies' batting - they did not like it up them - with a magnificent final spell. Despite tossing the ball up to encourage a chase, the final result could not be bought. Harry and Shambles were still discussing the case of the Heslop finger long into the night. | |
Jeremy Alwyn |
 14th May 2000
| |
Radlett II v Amersham II
Amersham 142-6 (40 ovs; H Matcham 79*)
Radlett 145-3 (33.4 ovs)
Radlett won by 7 wickets
A largely forgettable match unless your name is Hugo Matcham. Hugo batted extremely well for 79*, however the rest of the innings never got going and our score of 142 was never going to be enough on a drying pitch. Radlett raced to 90 and then spent an eternity getting the rest of runs. Waqar Watson had helped the opposition get off to a flying start giving us his overs mixed with 2 balls that batsman and keeper can't reach, 2 for the fielders to fetch from the long grass and 2 unplayable balls all delivered at hurtling pace. Alex Hands and Damian Van Duyvenbode kept one end reasonably secure before Harry Heslop was brought on to help us reach the bar sooner. | |
Jeremy Alwyn |
| |